Controlling AI Text Generation: Understanding Parameters That Shape Output

Introduction: The Art of Controlled Generation

LLMs for the end-user are a black box. We can't see what's going on inside. But we can still control in a limited way the output of the model by changing few parameters.

When a language model generates text, it's not simply "thinking" and producing words. Behind every generated sentence lies a complex decision-making process where the model scores then weighs thousands of possibilities at each step.

The good part is that we can minimally influence these decisions through parameters that control how the model selects its next words.

Think of it like directing a jazz musician. You can ask them to play conservatively (sticking to familiar melodies) or experimentally (exploring creative variations). Similarly, generation parameters let us guide AI models along the spectrum from predictable to creative, from focused to diverse.

Understanding Generation Control Parameters

The Decision Point: From Probabilities to Words

‍

‍

Let's examine our text generation process using a concrete example. When generating the continuation of "I love to go...", the model doesn't just pick one word—it calculates logits (raw scores) for the complete vocabulary of possible next tokens:

"Eat" → 5.1 logits
"Your" → 4.5 logits  
"Get" → 2.2 logits
"Count" → -0.9 logits
"Trump" → 0.7 logits
...and **hundreds** of thousands more


These logits are then converted to probabilities using the softmax function:

"Eat" → 34% probability
"Your" → 12% probability  
"Get" → 5% probability
"Count" → 0.1% probability
"Trump" → 3% probability
...


The question becomes: How do we choose from this probability distribution? This is where generation parameters come into play.

Core Generation Parameters

1. Temperature: The Creativity Dial

Temperature reshapes the entire probability distribution by modifying the softmax calculation:

‍

‍

Temperature = 0.1 (More Deterministic):

"Eat" → 99% probability
"Your" → 0.9% probability  
"Get" → 0.1% probability
"Count" → 0.000% probability


Result: "I love to go eat" (predictable)

Temperature = 1.0 (Normal):

"Eat" → 34% probability
"Your" → 12% probability  
"Get" → 5% probability
"Count" → 0.1% probability


Result: "I love to go shopping" (balanced)

Temperature = 100 (More Creative):

"Eat" → 25% probability
"Your" → 22% probability  
"Get" → 20% probability
"Count" → 18% probability


Result: "I love to go spelunking" (unexpected)

Temperature acts like a creativity dial — higher values flatten the probability distribution, giving unlikely tokens more chance to be selected.

2. Top-k Sampling: Fixed Token Selection

Instead of considering all possible tokens, top-k limits selection to the k most probable candidates.

For "I love to go" with different k values:

• k=1: Only "Eat" (greedy selection)
• k=3: Choose from "Eat", "Your", "Get"
• k=10: Consider top 10 tokens, including more diverse options

Effect: Smaller k values increase focus and reduce randomness, while larger k values allow more creativity.

3. Top-p (Nucleus Sampling): Dynamic Token Selection

Rather than fixing the number of tokens, top-p considers tokens until their cumulative probability reaches a threshold.

For "I love to go" with different p values:

• p=0.5: Include tokens until 50% probability ("Eat" + "Your" = 46%, add "Get" = 51%)
• p=0.8: Include more tokens up to 80% cumulative probability
• p=0.95: Consider most of the vocabulary

Advantage: Adapts to the probability distribution—narrow distributions use fewer tokens, broad distributions use more.

4. Frequency Penalty: Repetition Control

Reduces the probability of tokens based on how often they've appeared in the generated text.

Formula: [new_logit = original_logit - (frequency_penalty \times token_frequency)]

Example: If "go" has appeared 3 times already:

• Original logit for "go": 2.0
• With frequency_penalty=0.5: new_logit = 2.0 - (0.5 × 3) = 0.5
• Result: "go" becomes much less likely to be selected again

5. Presence Penalty: Vocabulary Diversity

Reduces the probability of any token that has already appeared, regardless of frequency.

Effect on "I love to go": If we've already used "love" and "go", those tokens become less likely in future selections, encouraging the model to use different vocabulary.

6. Length Control: Output Boundaries

• Max Tokens: Stops generation after reaching a specified number of tokens
• Stop Sequences: Ends generation when encountering specific phrases like "\n" or "END"

Parameter Interactions and Strategies

The Synergy Matrix

Different parameter combinations create distinct generation personalities:

‍

‍

Taking It to the Next Level: API Implementation

These generation control concepts aren't just theoretical—they're the foundation of practical text generation through API parameters. Modern LLM providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and others expose these exact parameters in their APIs, allowing you to apply everything we've discussed:

• temperature controls the creativity dial we explored
• top_p and top_k implement the sampling strategies
• frequency_penalty and presence_penalty manage repetition
• max_tokens sets length boundaries

By understanding how these parameters work with examples like "I love to go", you're equipped to make informed decisions when configuring API calls for your specific use cases—whether you need predictable documentation, engaging conversation, or creative content generation.

Conclusion

Generation parameters transform you from a passive user of AI to an active director of its creative process. By understanding how temperature reshapes probability distributions, how sampling methods select from those distributions, and how penalties guide vocabulary choices, you gain precise control over AI output quality and style.

The journey from "I love to go eat" (deterministic) to "I love to go quantum-leaping between parallel universes" (highly creative) is entirely within your control through parameter mastery.

Remember: Parameters are creative tools, not just technical settings. Each adjustment changes how the model weighs possibilities, turning the same input into entirely different expressive & inpredictable outcomes.

‍